From military clarity to corporate dashboards to a yacht racing the wrong way around the world — a marketer’s diary entry on what truly drives performance.
“Leadership is like navigating a storm: keep the crew steady, keep the boat afloat, and pretend you meant to sail in that direction all along.”
— Not Aristotle, but surely he would have approved
Dear Diary,
A disappearing LinkedIn post ambushed me today — one of those rare ones that actually makes you stop scrolling rather than accelerate.
The post asked:
“Have we misunderstood leadership all along?”
Before I knew it, my brain had already taken a detour through three completely different universes:
- modern military doctrine
- corporate number-driven leadership
- and a memory from Barcelona, 2022, when I heard Mark Denton describe what it takes to lead 17 amateurs 32,000 miles across the world’s roughest oceans.
Suddenly, all three models felt strangely connected — as if they were secretly trying to teach the same lesson in different dialects.
Wizard — why does leadership look so different depending on where you study it?

🔮📈 CMO Wizard answers:
Because each context optimizes for different risks:
- Military leadership prevents collapse under pressure.
- Corporate leadership reduces variance through metrics.
- Expedition leadership protects human capability in extreme conditions.
But beneath the surface, all three share one truth:
Your performance ceiling is determined by the humans executing the mission.
My translation: leadership styles vary wildly, but the humans underneath them remain stubbornly similar.
Note to Self 1: Military Leadership — Humans as Operational Capability
Modern military doctrine has one rule carved into granite:
👉 A leader’s primary duty is to maintain the unit’s operational capability.
And “operational capability” isn’t equipment, tactics, or budget.
It is — quite simply — the people.
Their:
- endurance
- clarity
- cognitive load
- emotional stability
- morale
- trust
Human-centric leadership isn’t “soft”. It’s oxygen — the least glamorous ingredient, and yet try performing without it.
If your people can’t function, nothing else matters.
Wiz — is the military sometimes more human-centric than corporate leadership?

🔮📈 CMO Wizard answers:
Often, yes.
Military systems explicitly connect human capability to mission outcomes.
Corporate environments frequently treat “people issues” as separate from “performance issues,” which creates blind spots and weakens long-term results.
Who would’ve thought that the battlefield manual would make a stronger case for humanity than many annual reports?
Note to Self 2: Number Leadership — When Dashboards Become Deities
Corporate leadership has a well-known love affair with numbers.
And I do understand why — metrics feel concrete, tidy, reassuring.
But sometimes the numbers become the goal instead of the guide.
You know the signs:
- decisions orbiting quarterly targets instead of purpose
- people treated like adjustable levers on a dashboard
- pressure mistaken for progress
- “busy” celebrated more loudly than “effective”
- exhaustion disguised as commitment
This is where the 2025 HBR study landed with force:
Teams with high psychological safety had significantly lower burnout and turnover — even under intense pressure.
Not a perk. Not a luxury.
A requirement.
Wizard — why do companies cling to metrics even when people are clearly signaling strain?

🔮📈 CMO Wizard answers:
Because numbers feel controllable.
Humans introduce unpredictability.
But ignoring human capacity leads to slower cycles, poor decisions, and high turnover — hidden costs that don’t show up on dashboards until the damage is done.
If dashboards tracked “team energy reserve” alongside revenue, prioritization meetings would look very different.
Note to Self 3: Crews & Skippers — What Mark Denton Taught Me at Sea (Well, in Barcelona)
There I was in Barcelona, 2022, listening to Mark Denton describe the BT Global Challenge:
A skipper tasked with leading 17 amateurs (70% first-time sailors!) 32,000 miles against the spin of the earth, with no hiring or firing option, and only one rule:
Safe. Happy. Fast.
A gentle chain reaction, really: safety lifts spirits, lifted spirits lift performance — and suddenly, “fast” is not a demand but a consequence.
What struck me most:
- He started with why each person was really there
- He built a shared purpose: “We’re here to realise everyone’s dream in one way or another”
- He insisted on distinct roles, mastered deeply
- He created daily psychological safety (cockpit meetings mid-storm asking: “What do we need to do differently?”)
- He dismantled unhealthy internal competition between the two watches
- He introduced short-term shared goals (“overtake that boat in 24 hours”)
- And he lived by the line every leadership team should tattoo on the office wall:
👉 “Don’t break the people or the boat.”
Not metaphorical.
Not inspirational.
Literal survival.
Wiz’o Wiz — why is this sailing story so relevant for marketing teams today?

🔮📈 CMO Wizard answers:
Because it mirrors the environment modern marketing teams operate in:
- constrained resources
- shifting priorities
- volatile markets
- dependence on distinct specialised roles
- and constant tactical adaptation
Success requires exactly what Denton exemplified:
clear roles, shared purpose, learning loops, psychological safety, and respect for human capacity.
Part of me wonders if marketing teams would thrive with a small daily “cockpit check” — just to align, breathe, and stop the boat from metaphorically veering into Iceland.
And the Final Reality Check, Wiz’o Wiz: What Kind of Leadership Works Best for Marketing Teams?
After comparing soldiers, spreadsheets, and storm-battered sailors, one thing becomes clear:
Marketing teams need a hybrid model — the best of each world:
- Military clarity about mission and human capability
- Corporate discipline in measuring what matters (but not worshipping it)
- Skipper-style teamwork where roles are mastered and interdependent
- Psychological safety built in as operational infrastructure
- Adaptability, because the weather changes hourly
- Shared purpose, especially under pressure
In short:
Humans first. Numbers second. Storms always.
Wiz — final check: does this leadership model hold?

🔮📈 CMO Wizard answers:
Yes.
This combination enables sustainable speed, creativity, resilience, and better pipeline outcomes.
It’s the leadership model that allows marketing teams to perform consistently — even in challenging conditions.
My final takeaway: storms are manageable.
It’s sailing without clarity — or without a crew — that sinks the ship.
Also, memo to future me: it wouldn’t hurt to learn to sail… and perhaps invest in a decent raincoat while at it.
Further Reading & Compass Points Behind This Exploration:
Mark Denton — Navigate the Storm: Teamwork (Barcelona 2022 keynote)
Also in Youtube
Harvard Business Review (2025) — In Tough Times, Psychological Safety Is a Requirement, Not a Luxury

Leave a comment